Property Taxes Wrong, Wrong, Wrong  |  Nancy Pelosi Nancy's Nazis |  Jimmy Carter  Kerry  |   Dave Ramsey  |  Catholic Church | King Henry |   Fucking French Daschle  |  Dizzy Chickens (Dixie Chicks) Iraq  |  TV  |   Prayer | Drugs   |  New York   |    Barbara Lee Bin Laden  |    Software Encryption  |   Census 2000  |   Election 2000  |   Web Freedom |   News Media  |  Abortion  |  Texas Senate  |  Libertarian Party  | Hanoi  Jane Fonda   | 'Terrorists are Brave' Ted Turner New Spurs Arena  |    Condom (Gary  Condit)  |   Clinton  |  Taxes  |   Social Security   |   Welfare   |   Democrats  |     Republicans   |   Janet Reno  |   AOL  |   Japan  |  US Constitution   |  Oklahoma ( I am so sorry I every went to Oklahoma) State Government  |  Main

 

Thursday, 08 February 2007

If you can tell welfare recipients how to spend their money, then it stands to reason that we can do the same thing with Social Security checks.

I have heard a rumor that the reason Social Security is mandatory is 'we do not want people not having any money after they are too old to work to become wards of the state'. So we are going to make them wards of the state.

The United States Post Office is a model that should be followed by Social Security, provide a good product, if you want to buy it, if not there are many other ways to send mail. FedEx, UPS, for example. If Social Security could follow this simple rule, they would be much better at what they do. Imagine a world where EVERYONE had to buy stamps even if you never mailed anything, it sounds whacky, but that is exactly what Social Security is now. Can you imagine how inefficient the post office would be if they got paid 'no matter what'. That is where Social Security is today.

Taxation without representation was one of the reasons the American revolution happened. Social Security may be a noble cause, but it is also taxation without representation. When the program depends on the generosity of people not even born yet, it hard to say this is anything else. We are taxing our unborn children and there is  no way, they could have agreed to it.

According to the Social Security web site (http://www.ssa.gov/legislation/2006FactSheet.pdf) they collect 702 billion in taxes. 82 billion was the first Iraq war cost. I guess this means that Social Security (unconstitutional big brother mandated 'retirement system' is equal to 8 plus wars (constitutional) at the same time.

FDR had to sale Social Security to a Supreme Court! The argument was is was in the federal governments right to tax. If that is the case folks, there is nothing in the Constitution that allows the U. S. Government to exempt it self from any taxes! If Social Security is a tax, as FDR put it, then all federal officials that have exempted themselves are guilty of tax evasion.

I have heard a rumor that if you have been a commi, you can't get Social Security. Where are the commies when you need them most. http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html

Is Social Security Constitutional
www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/attarian7.html

January 1, 1937 Workers began to acquire credits toward old-age insurance benefits. Employers and employees became subject to a tax of one percent of wages on up to $3,000 a year. Lump-sum payments were first made payable to eligible workers, their survivors or their estates. The Federal unemployment tax payable by employers of 8 or more was increased to two percent of payroll.
www.ssa.gov/history/1930.html

 

 

I know most people look at Social Security as an entitlements program, but here it is. There is no magic bank in Washington saving your money for you. The reason Social Security is here is Jim O'Connor and his rich buddies are paying for your checks. If it is a civic duty to pay for old peoples retirement, at least share the burden, but those same like, Nancy the Nazi, that insist Social Security is good for you have exempted them selves from there 'civic duty'.

I can not speak for the Supreme Court, but given there is NOTHING in the Constitution that makes mandatory participation anywhere close to legal, it stands to reason that at some point the Supreme Court will probably let us off the hook. Since this has been a pain in my wallet for so long, maybe I should find a lawyer to challenge it myself. Ah my, people will say "Jim is the guy that undid 60 of 'progress'.

Heads-up folks. Every democrat (or socialist) since FDR that has a fix for the program always come with something such as 'it is time our well to do was asked to contribute more'. Then the Nazis fight over how much more, and instead of just the well to do being asked for more, the end result is everyone pays massive increased taxes. The income tax thing started off as means to make the rich folks pay higher taxes. Now every one that earns more that $7,000.00 a year is paying the 'rich mans' tax.

If we call it a welfare program for old people and fund it out of  the general fund what is the difference? I still pay, and the old folks still collect, but at least the Nancy's Nazis are going to pay too. I just now realized as I was  typing, I am making it real easy for the Nancy's Nazis, to take more money.

For over 20 years I have known that Social Security is a bad idea, but I tried to offer real fixes, I have said for 20 years, just let me opt-out and I will not ask for any of my money that I have paid into it back. Of course, I have always known there is no money to refund any way. But since Nancy's Nazis are going to 'fix' it with even more of Jim O'Connor's money, I am now demanding a full refund! You have held me hostage for way too long to be nice. Please Send a full refund today.

How much is Social Security tax? 18.2% of your pay! Ask any of your lawmakers that easy question, they will almost always lie!

If collect Social Security keep in mind, they do not have any of the money you paid saved. The only reason they have money for you is because the are steeling so much from me. 18.2% to be exact! If Social Security is such a good deal, why do they lie about how much tax the smart people pay. And if Social Security is so good, then why let smart people decide whether or not they should join.

Who pays for Social Security? The tax payers that live next door such as Jim O'Connor. Ask your lawmakers and they will tell you it is "Government Funded".

If Social Security is such a good deal, why don't the  'stupid John Kerry's' and other American socialist pay it?

We Americans hate the word socialist, but we love the practice!

It may not be all bad! But I think it is way wrong to mandate every American over 65 must get on Social Security. Kerry is happy with it now, but just wait to see what happens when he turns 65 and the ONLY doctor he can see is going to be a government doctor. Buy the time Kerry and Hillary get done fucking up the American medical system, we will thank god that we have all of those 'Government Funded' doctors for a cure.

When you hear politicians saying 'Government Can do More', they usually mean 'Government can make Jim O'Connor and his friends do more''

FDR was the first American socialist! Thank you! He was also America's first liar! "Only one percent of your pay for social security! FDR gets the credit for inventing Social Security and Jim O'Connor and his rich friends in Texas are still paying the bill!

At least Bill had no conviction past today's poll. Bill also had a French backbone. That Hillary lady (alleged) on the other hand will be the death to what little is left of American freedom. He (I mean she) knows 'Government does everything better that people can' Here again, if she were my wife, I wouldn't fuck her either! Who can blame Bill on this issue? It could be that everyone has to fuck someone, and since no one is fucking Hillary, she is going to fuck America. Just like all the great socialist in history, "Government" is always the fix. At least while you are the socialist in charge.


 

 

Here is a lady (Molly Ivins) in Texas that says, 'The Social Security System is in no danger whatsoever'. The program started at one percent of your money. Wow watta deal. The tax is now 18%, let me see that is a 1800% increase over that last 50 years, so if the trend continues, that means our grand kids will have to pay $2.25 for every $1.00 they earn! Which part of 225% of your pay is not a problem. Do the math. There is a real problem. I will say this to the generation that will be expected to pay me 225% of their pay, 'Theft is theft even it is government sectioned, and even if you are on the receiving end of the theft! For those of you that expect to collect Social Security, how are you going to get $2.25 out of $1.00 earned? The math is correct! This is not a tall tell.  The ONLY way they will fix Social Security is to make it voluntary! That would force the Social Security people to fix it. 

Folks, I am 100% on board with finding ways to keep lazy people out of the American work force. Social Security, Food Stamps, Medicare, and HUD are all working fine! Giving dumb people a way to live without having them mucking up our workforce. This is the best thing the Democrats have ever done for the American companies! Everyone I know on these programs is convinced that the money is coming from the 'Government'. This could be way better planning than I could have done on my own because the 'Social Security' and 'Welfare' recipients are totally clueless as to who is funding the 'We think your too stupid to make your own money programs'. FDR is great, Thank you. They do not know it is Jim O'Connor and other tax payers funding these and other measures to keep them out of site and out of mind!

If politicians want to take credit for Social Security, I say let them pay for it! Folks, if you get Social Security, it is no thanks to the politicians that exempt themselves from it! It is because no matter how 'generous' politicians get, I ALWAYS get the bill. I live right next door!

Folks, ask anyone on the street who pays for Social Security and Medicare, and you may be surprised how few people know that it is you and me! Most people will say 'the government'. That is wrong, Jim O'Connor and all his friends who work pay the bill! Almost a 5th of our pay goes to pay for Social Security and Medicare.

Ask people how much of their pay goes to Social Security and Medicare, and they will tell you 7% give or take. Wrong again, we could use a truth in tax law to force the tax people to be honest about how big a chunk is. Most people do not understand that is their work that earns the "Employer Contribution".  Most folks only know what they see on the pay stub, and the rest is by design hidden from employees. If people knew how big the bite really is they would get fired up and demand some action.

If you give the FDRs of the world credit, then send them the bill too. How did FDR find a way to make me pay for his generosity? We need to find a way to take money from our unborn kids too. FDR will always be remembered as the best damn scammer in the world. 

 

The American SS!  Socialist (I mean Social) Security.

    Hey folks, It is time to be counted! I promise I will not take money from my neighbors just because they did it to me. Theft is theft, just because the IRS is the middleman, that doesn't make it right! I will NOT EVER condone stealing even if it has the blessing of special interest groups and paid for politicians!

    To everyone on Social Security! You Are stealing my money! Why? You know the system is going to crash! Anyone with a calculator knows that. If you set up your own retirement, you don't have to worry about your grandkids and neighbors being able to pay for it.

    Is it right that you collect money from Social Security? After all, you too were made a slave of the system for all of those years. One would think so but, you and I both know that the government does not save your money. It is at best a bad pyramid scheme. The money you collect today comes directly off of my dinner table and that of my co-workers! I don't even know you! Do you really think it is wise to steal money from your neighbors, such as myself, just because the politicians say it is ok? The bottom line here, I will NOT STEAL any tax payers money after I retire. I do have moral values!  Let me repeat, I will not take money from future workers EVER! I will plan for my own retirement, thank you. This statement alone should get me out of paying for Socialist Security, but I know that is not the case. I will continue to have my paychecks robbed because that's the way it was when they (65 and older crowd) were working. The only saving grace we have is that it WILL fall flat on its face. I hope it doesn't take too much longer! I can not urge you enough to tell the Social Security Administration that you too will not be collecting any money STOLEN from your Sons, Daughters, or any of today's workers. Your government promised they would pay you and they should damn well keep their word! NOT me, my Wife, or your other neighbors!!! We didn't promise you anything. In fact, we were not even born yet!

    I have a right to your unborn children's money! Only FDR could have dreamed up such a scam! My hat's off to the man. A schemer from hell! You bet! Watch out for a few people that will get you re-elected and let their offspring pay the bill! Yes this was an American first, this FDR guy. How did someone become President with absolutely no foresight? I mean all of this happened way before Clinton lowered the bar to an all new low.

    I can easily see how this was sold to the American public. When FDR (Plucking Dumb Roosevelt) started this program, the tax was only 1, yes I said one percent of a person's income.

    We now pay 15%! If you look at your pay statement, you will only see about 7 and a half. That's because, technically, your employer pays the rest. Unless you are self employed, then you get the bill for the whole thing. To make it look like the employer is paying part of it, you just get paid 7.65 percent less to begin with. Now it looks like you and your employer are sharing the cost! What a nice thing for our government to do. Hell why not be real nice and pay folks 15 percent less, and say that employers pay all Social Security taxes?

    Now that we have had a 15 fold (that is a 1500 % increase) in the tax to maintain the program over the last 50 years, what about its future. When the program started, you made a buck, and the government took a penny. What a great deal! Now you make a buck, they take 15 cents! Still no biggie, right? If over the last 50 years have required a 1500 percent increase, then it stands to reason, that the next 50 years will be about the same. 15 cents now, will cost 225 percent in the next 50 years. This means for every dollar you earn, Social Security tax will be two dollars and 25 cents. How the hell do they do that? I don't know. But I do know that it's not rocket science to know that this program CAN NOT continue on its present course. I have to admit those folks at Social Security are smarter than me. And they have special government calculators that will give you any answer you want! So not to worry!

    I have often wondered if anyone has ever challenged mandatory participation in court and won?

    You bet I have a financial plan for the future. Government securities! Social Security and the Texas lotto. But in all fairness, I do actually have a one in 15 million chance to collect something from the lotto which is substantially better than Social Security!

    American SS is morally wrong and unconstitutional!

    I guess I should actually have  just the opposite opinion. If as many of you as possible will get every dime you can out of the system, this would help it to crash a little faster! That would be a good thing.

    You do not have a write to your neighbors money just because FDR screwed you and me over!

    The buck stops here. I do have morals! If I have to pay the American SS tax all my life, I promise my neighbors I will not allow the federal government to take food off of their table just to put it on mine!

 

Webmaster

Monday, May 21, 2007